The production of systematic reviews has increased markedly over the past few years , but in a lot of cases the systemic review format is not the best methodology to use. Systematic reviews can be inappropriate for a variety of reasons:
If you feel your circumstances or research topic match any of the above, a systematic review may not be the best approach for you. You could still do a literature review, and adopt elements of systematic review methodology, rather than a systematic review.
Andrea Tricco at Knowledge Synthesis has developed Right for You? (link opens in new window), an online tool 'designed to provide guidance and supporting material to reviewers on methods for the conduct and reporting of knowledge synthesis.' The tool will suggest an appropriate review type, and resources to support the review.
Marshall Dozier, College Lead Librarian at the College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine at Edinburgh University, has created a presentation called Literature Reviews: Functions, Types and Methods (link opens in new window). The presentation is approximately 12 minutes long and is well worth considering as a resource.
Marshall states: "When we think of a literature review, we often forget to consider the different types of reviews and the different roles or functions that literature reviews can have. In this short presentation I will first discuss some functions of literature reviews, and then make some points about how the function or purpose of your review should inform the type that you choose to do, and the methods that you employ".
For any assistance/advice required please contact the Library Team at: hhsl@uhi.ac.uk